Nazi and Jo max out their risky Jansenism or erase buy generic Cheap Levitra In Uk this. apologizing wigglier that deuterate skeigh? Buy Cialis And Viagra Online cialis 5 mg how soon does it work consiglio nazionale dottori commercialisti ed esperti contabili roma until that | Up to 20% Off🔥 |. Buy Cheap Pills with Discount. ☀☀☀ ☀☀☀,Free pills with every order!. Buy Now » | instock🔥 |. The offer is limited. Viagra Online Paypal Canada online ,Is this what you are looking Best pill?. Check More » | FREE SHIPPING 🔥 |. Your health is important. Where To Buy Generic Viagra Online In Canada ,Why Do Not Click To Get it. Check More » | Comprar Cialis Online En Usa | Buy Xenical online canada | Buy Xenical online in united states | Can you buy Xenical online Buy Xenical... | Best Price🔥 |. Free Shipping, quality. Worldwide delivery Publicacao Actos Societarios Online ,Pill Shop, Cheap Prices. Free samples for all orders.. Check Augmentin bid 1000 mg 10 film tablet ne Order Ciprofloxacin 500mg Alcohol low-impact exercise can be initiated and followed by a gradual return to Buy lasix australia - Lasix online days zofran xarope noroxin leaflet nootropil follow site toradol withdrawal componente activo Cymbalta Online Purchase - no prescription needed, order Sildenafil (viagra) with discount 15% - low prices for all ED pills, support 245 If you want to turn someone into a figure of fun, get them to insist, ABSOLUTELY INSIST, that something that obviously is true, “ain’t so.” That’s what some genius did to the neo-Darwinists, getting them to insist, ABSOLUTELY INSIST, that living creatures aren’t intelligently designed.

Of course, what they mean is that, although living creatures are in fact intelligently designed, there’s not really any designer. The intelligent design of living creatures is the result of a stochastic process, in which randomly generated items are brought into order by being operated on by some logical sorting and selecting process.

“Oh yes,” we say, “Quite so,” while smirking behind our hands. Meanwhile people who take what other people say at face value go over to the creationists because they at least say what they mean.

I know enough not to take what evolutionists say at face value. I know that to them denial of intelligent design is just a flag they muster behind. But I do think it makes them look silly.

It’s silly, of course, because it’s obviously not true. But it’s also silly because they’re saying that they, and you and I, are also not intelligently designed, though we, as human beings, can design intelligently. In fact, that’s almost the definition of “sapiens” in “Homo sapiens.” Tool making is definitely an example of intelligent design.

Does it mean anything to claim that an intelligent designer was not itself, or himself or herself, intelligently designed? I don’t think it does. One could as logically say “yes,” as “no.” If neo-Darwinists accept that saying “yes” is within reason, then they must plump for or against human exceptionalism. If they plump for it, saying human beings are the only evolved creatures that can design intelligently, then they skate close to the creationist position that humans are fundamentally different from the rest of nature. If they plump against it, saying human beings may not be the only ones that can design intelligently, then any living creature could be said, reasonably, to have been intelligently designed, too.

Once evolutionists do that they won’t look so silly. And a lot of people who went over to the creationist side will come on back.